Can an HOA hold virtual meetings and vote electronically?
Reviewed by the OurHOA team · Updated June 2026
Whether HOAs can meet over video and vote online, how state laws and governing documents control what's allowed, the consent and transparency requirements that come with electronic voting, the tension between online ballots and secret-ballot laws, and how boards adopt these tools without cutting corners.
Why this question got urgent
Before 2020, most HOA meetings were strictly in person, and many governing documents written decades ago simply never contemplated video calls or online voting. The pandemic forced the issue: communities that couldn't gather in a clubhouse still had to elect boards, pass budgets, and conduct business, so a wave of states amended their nonprofit-corporation and HOA statutes to expressly permit virtual or hybrid meetings and, in some cases, electronic voting. The result is a patchwork - some states now clearly allow these tools, some allow them only under conditions, and some still say little - and an association's first job is to find out which category it's in rather than assume the modern, convenient option is automatically legal for it.
What controls whether it's allowed
Two layers decide it: state law and your own governing documents. State statute sets the outer boundary - whether virtual meetings and electronic ballots are permitted at all, and with what safeguards - and the governing documents and any board-adopted rules fill in the details within that boundary. A board can't simply decide on its own to switch to online voting if the statute or the documents require a particular method; conversely, where the law now permits virtual meetings, an old document that assumed in-person gatherings usually doesn't forbid them, but the safer course is to adopt clear rules (or amend the documents) so the practice rests on something solid. The recurring mistake is treating 'it's more convenient' as authority. The authority has to come from the statute and the documents, and those are what a board should check before changing how the community meets or votes.
The consent and access requirements
Statutes that allow electronic participation almost always attach strings, and the most common is member consent and access. Electronic voting typically can't be forced on owners: members generally must opt in to receiving and casting ballots electronically, and an owner who prefers a paper ballot usually has to be allowed to keep one, so the community can't disenfranchise residents who aren't online. Virtual meetings carry their own access duties - every owner entitled to participate has to be able to hear and be heard, the technology has to be reasonably available, and proper notice has to include how to connect. The point of these requirements is that moving online can't quietly exclude the less-connected members; the same right to participate that exists in a clubhouse has to survive the move to a screen.
The secret-ballot tension
Electronic voting collides with another rule some states impose: that certain HOA votes - board elections especially, and some assessment or document votes - be conducted by secret ballot. A secret ballot has to keep the voter anonymous while still verifying they were eligible, which is exactly the double-envelope mail process several states require. Doing that electronically is genuinely hard, because an online system has to separate the voter's identity from their vote convincingly enough to satisfy a secret-ballot law, and states that require secret ballots have generally allowed electronic voting only under tight conditions - often through an approved independent vendor that guarantees the anonymity-and-verification split. So the answer to 'can we just vote by email?' is usually no for the votes that matter most: where secret balloting is required, an informal online vote won't meet the standard, and the association needs either a compliant electronic system or the traditional sealed-ballot process.
Adopting these tools the right way
A board that wants the convenience without the legal risk works in order: confirm what the state statute actually permits; read the governing documents for any method requirements; adopt clear written rules (or amend the documents) covering how virtual meetings run and how electronic voting works; collect the required member consents and preserve a paper option; and, where secret balloting is required, use a system or vendor built to honor it. Notice still has to go to everyone with the connection details, minutes still have to be kept, and the same quorum and recordkeeping standards still apply - the medium changed, not the obligations. Done this way, virtual meetings and electronic voting genuinely raise participation, because they remove the 'I couldn't make it to the clubhouse' barrier that sinks so many quorums; done carelessly, they hand the losing side of any vote an easy way to challenge the result.
Where the right tools make participation easier
The real promise of meeting and voting online is reach: an owner who would never drive to a Tuesday-night meeting will join a video call or return a ballot from their phone, and that's often the difference between a meeting that reaches quorum and one that fails. But the upside only holds if the process is clean - proper notice, an accurate roster, member consent on file, and a record that shows the vote was reached and counted correctly. OurHOA helps small self-managed communities keep that organized membership, notice, and record-keeping foundation, so that when a board does move toward virtual meetings or electronic participation, the convenience comes with the documentation that keeps the result trustworthy and hard to challenge.
OurHOA is the friendly, affordable way self-managed communities keep dues, records, and reminders in one place. See how it works.
These guides are general education for HOA boards and residents, not legal, tax, or financial advice. Rules vary by state and by your community's governing documents - check with a professional for your situation.