How do we set up an HOA architectural review committee from scratch?
By OurHOA · General information · Revised
How an HOA board sets up an architectural review committee: authority, charter, members, application intake, written decisions, appeals and TX, FL and CO rules.
Part of the HOA board handbook: running the board.
The short answer
Start with the declaration, not a volunteer sign-up sheet. The committee can only review what the governing documents let the association review, so confirm that power first. Then the board adopts a short charter by resolution, appoints three or five members with staggered terms, publishes an application form with a review deadline, and requires every decision to go out in writing and into a log. Plan on about 90 days from the board vote to the first application. Two statutes change the setup in our core states. In Texas, an association with more than 40 lots cannot seat a current director, a director's spouse, or anyone living in a director's household on the committee once the developer period is over (Tex. Prop. Code 209.00505(c)). In Florida, the committee's power exists only to the extent the declaration states it or reasonably implies it, and it must apply its standards evenly to every owner (Fla. Stat. 720.3035(1)(a)). Rules vary by state and by your own documents, and this guide is general education, not legal advice.
Confirm the authority and who is allowed to serve
Read three things before you recruit anyone. First, the declaration's architectural control article. It says what needs approval (often any exterior change, fence, paint color, roof, or outbuilding), who reviews it, and sometimes a deadline after which a request is deemed approved. Write that deadline down, because missing it can mean approving by accident. Second, the bylaws, for how committees are created and whether the board or the members appoint them. Third, any old committee resolutions, since some communities had a committee that faded away but was never dissolved. Then check the state rules on membership. The Texas restriction above applies only to associations of more than 40 lots and not while the declarant controls architectural review (209.00505(b)). Smaller Texas communities and most associations elsewhere can seat a director, but a committee made up entirely of directors gives an owner no second look before the board. Our guide on forming an HOA committee covers charters and appointments for any committee. This one covers what is specific to design review.
Adopt a one-page charter
The charter tells the committee what it decides and tells owners what to expect. Keep it to one page and adopt it by board resolution at a noticed meeting. A sample motion: 'I move that the board establish the Architectural Review Committee under Article VII of the Declaration, adopt the attached charter, appoint Dana Ruiz, Mark Chen and Priya Nair to terms ending December 31, 2027, 2027 and 2028, and direct the secretary to post the charter and application form for owners by March 1.' The charter itself should cover five points. What the committee reviews, citing the declaration article. What it cannot do, such as fine owners, grant variances from the declaration, or spend association money. The review deadline, which must be no longer than any deadline in the declaration. How members recuse themselves. How an owner appeals. Leave the design standards out of the charter. Those belong in the architectural guidelines, which have their own guide, so the board can update the rules without rewriting the committee.
Pick members who can say no to a neighbor
Three members is enough for a community of 26 to 150 homes. Five makes quorum harder to reach without making decisions better. Stagger terms so at least one experienced member stays each year, and name one alternate who steps in when a member recuses. Look for one person who reads plans comfortably (a contractor, architect, engineer or a patient DIY owner), one who knows the guidelines well, and one who is good with owners. Avoid anyone in an open dispute with the association or a neighbor. Write the recusal rule plainly: a member does not review an application for their own lot, an adjoining lot, or a lot owned by a relative or business partner, and does not discuss that application with the other members. In a small community recusals happen often, which is why the alternate matters. Give each new member the declaration article, the guidelines, the last year of decisions, and 30 minutes with the board president about tone. Most complaints about committees are about tone, not outcomes.
Build the application and intake steps
The review clock usually starts when the association receives the application, so intake is where committees get into trouble. Use one form and one inbox, such as a dedicated email address or a drop box, and log every request the day it arrives with a request number and the date received. The form should ask for the lot and owner, a description of the work, a site sketch showing location and setbacks, materials and colors with a photo or sample, the contractor, and planned start and finish dates. Within five days, the chair checks completeness and tells the owner in writing what is missing. State in the form whether the deadline runs from receipt or from a complete application, and make sure the declaration allows that. California's statute is a useful model even outside California: Civil Code 4765 requires a fair, reasonable and expeditious procedure, written in the governing documents, with a maximum response time for both the first decision and any reconsideration. A 30-day review target works for most small communities. Hold a standing meeting twice a month in building season so nothing sits.
Write every decision down, with the rule behind it
An approval letter should list the request number, what was approved, any conditions, and a completion deadline. A denial must say why. Florida requires a denial to be in writing and to state with specificity the rule or covenant the association relied on (720.3035(4)(a)). In Texas communities covered by 209.00505, the denial notice goes by certified mail, hand delivery or electronic delivery, describes the basis for the denial and the changes that would allow approval, and tells the owner they can request a hearing before the board within 30 days. The board then holds the hearing within 30 days of the request, gives the owner at least 10 days' notice, and may affirm, modify or reverse the decision (209.00505(d) through (i)). California gives an applicant reconsideration by the board at an open meeting (Civ. Code 4765(a)(5)). A denial paragraph the committee can adapt: 'Request 2026-014 is denied because the proposed 6-foot solid privacy fence exceeds the 4-foot height limit in Section 3.2 of the Architectural Guidelines for front-yard fences. The committee would approve a fence of 4 feet or less in the same location, or a 6-foot fence set behind the front building line. You may request a hearing before the board within 30 days of this notice.' Never approve anything verbally, including at the curb.
Adopt the rules state law already requires
Some states tell the committee what it must allow, and a new committee should check these before the first review. In Colorado, an association cannot prohibit water-wise front yards on detached single-family lots, and it must select at least three preplanned water-wise garden designs that are preapproved for front yards, allow reasonable plant substitutions, and post those designs on its public website if it has one (C.R.S. 38-33.3-106.5(1)(i.5)). An owner can sue over a knowing violation after giving the association 45 days to fix it. The same section limits how Colorado committees regulate flags, signs, rain barrels and defensible-space tree removal. In Florida, the board must adopt hurricane protection specifications, and the committee cannot deny an application that meets them (720.3035(6)). Florida committees also cannot review interior changes that are not visible from the street, neighboring parcels or common areas (720.3035(1)(b)). Put a short list of these statutory must-allows at the top of the committee's reference binder.
Keep a decision log and report to the board
The log is the committee's memory and its best defense against the claim that 'you approved it for the Hendersons.' One row per request: number, lot, date received, date complete, description, decision, conditions, the rule cited, decision date, and completion inspection date. Colorado makes this a required association record: 38-33.3-317(1)(m) lists records of board or committee actions approving or denying design requests. The same statute lets the association withhold architectural drawings from other owners unless the drawings' owner consents (317(3)(a)), so keep the log in the owner-facing records and the plans in a separate folder. Send the board a quarterly summary with counts, average days to decision, denials and any request that went past deadline. When the committee sees the same variance request three times, that is a signal to recommend a guideline change rather than keep saying no.
Mistakes new committees make
The costly ones are predictable. Letting the declaration's deadline lapse because the application sat in a director's personal email. Approving a paint color from a phone photo and then fighting about what 'sage' meant. Adding requirements that are not in the guidelines, such as preferring one shingle brand, which invites an unequal-treatment claim. A board member quietly telling an owner to go ahead while the committee is still reviewing. Treating the committee as a violation squad; enforcement belongs to the board's fine and hearing process. And launching without telling owners. A sample timeline: board adopts the charter and appoints members in month one, the committee drafts the form and reviews the guidelines in month two, and the association mails and emails owners the charter, form and deadline in month three with a start date. After the first year, review the log and ask whether any rule produced most of the denials.
Sources
- Texas Property Code chapter 209 (section 209.00505, architectural review authority)
- Florida Statutes 720.3035: architectural control covenants (2026)
- Colorado Revised Statutes title 38 (CCIOA sections 38-33.3-106.5 and 38-33.3-317)
- California Civil Code section 4765: architectural review and decisionmaking
These guides are general education for HOA boards and residents, not legal, tax, or financial advice. Rules vary by state and by your community's governing documents - check with a professional for your situation.
More from the board handbook
- New HOA board member checklist: what to do in your first month
- Should an HOA board adopt a code of conduct, and what should it say?
- What does an HOA board need to do each month of the year?
- How do you get more homeowners to run for the HOA board?
- What written policies should every HOA board have?
- Should HOA board members use personal email, and how should the board manage passwords?
- How should an HOA board handle a disruptive homeowner at a meeting?
- How can an HOA board track decisions and action items between meetings?
- How do we run an HOA annual meeting when we expect not to reach quorum?
- How should an HOA board run a fair violation hearing before it fines an owner?
- What should an HOA board do when an owner threatens to sue?